12 Angry Men Essays (440 words) - Fiction, Film, Law, Free Essays

12 Angry Men Essays (440 words) - Fiction, Film, Law, Free Essays 12 Angry Men Every man put on trial is considered innocent until proven guilty. In 12 Angry Men this theory can almost be considered false to the jurors involved in this murder case. But one man can be credited with sticking to the innocent until proven guilty theory that most likely saved a mans life. This juror must show 11 other jurors that he can prove with enough valid evidence that this boy is be wrongfully accused of killing his father. Reginald Rose shows us how that one mans integrity can prove to make a big difference in a kids life. Juror #8 can be credited with saving someones life. Under intense and hostile scrutiny juror #8 is the only juror to vote not guilty on the stabbing death of a boys father. #8 doesnt believe straight out that this boy is innocent of this crime. #8 believes that it would wrong to send a boy off to be executed without discussing it first. Jurors #3 and #10 are the most hostile of the jurors. They believe deep down that this boy killed his father. They believe that everything they heard in the courtroom holds true and they dont really want to see this kid live any longer. Juror #8 still had reasonable doubt about the murder. He doesnt want to vote guilty until he has enough evidence that this boy did indeed kill his father. Many different points are made about the boy who supposedly stabbed his father, that are cross examined well by juror #8 who still stands alone at not guilty. All of the evidence that the 11 jurors found contains flaws in them. For instance the woman who supposedly witnessed the stabbing wasnt wearing her glasses. Also the stab wound in the boys father was made so that a taller man or boy could have made that type of wound with a switchblade knife. When these key pieces of evidence becomes clearer to the 11 jurors we start to see jurors questioning there own guilty vote. #9 is the second juror to vote guilty, because he too has some reasonable doubt. As more evidence is put on the table the 12 jurors come together and decide that this boy is innocent. In conclusion, juror #8 believes that every person is innocent until proven guilty. He was given many pieces of key evidence that showed this boys guilt but the evidence was examined carefully, and as more evidence was put out more jurors believed this boy was indeed innocent bringing them all together to believe this boys innocence Bibliography don't got one

Content Analysis of The Catbird Seat Essay Example

Content Analysis of The Catbird Seat Essay Example Content Analysis of The Catbird Seat Essay Content Analysis of The Catbird Seat Essay The story can be called as a revenge comedy because of its unexpected and funny ending. Revenge is a word which has a deep meaning behind it. It’s a feeling more than an action. In this story of Mr. Thurber, the feelings of Mr. Martin are touched by giving details step by step. Mr. Martin is a meek, introverted and socially isolated person. His job is his life. He doesn’t have any hobby. He doesn’t even know the popular sports jargons of his time. Such a man can do anything for his job and such workers are preferred by every kind of company. Mrs. Barrows is a smart woman. At least, she looks like one. She is the special adviser of the president Mr. Fitweiler. She is a dominant woman and she is quite obnoxious. Because of her, many co-workers of Mr. Martin were fired from the company. So, something must be done to stop this woman. Otherwise the person who will be fired next will be Mr. Martin. Because of these reasons, Mr. Martin makes up his mind and decides to k ill Mrs. Barrows. This is what we call revenge or vengeance. At this point, I would like to share Eric Sheridan’s craft discussion on the narration of the story. Thurber builds an entire story around this most unexpected action, and in doing so creates dramatic tension in an engaging way, even though we see almost immediately behind Mr. Martin’s curtain. The reader is let in on the secret early on: Martin is not what he appears to be; he is a different man when pushed. His inner trail and conviction of Barrows tell us right away that something is up. But the dramatic tension is built as the detail of Martin’s plan becomes clear. (2002) In the story, the author constantly gives details and small elements of the big picture of the events which are going to happen. This method of the author can be called detective narration. At the beginning of the story Mr. Martin goes to the most crowded cigar store of Broadway, NYC. The readers don’t have any idea about what his n